The future of publishing (I): disintermediation vs unbundling

The advent of print-on-demand and digital reading has brought much discussion on the question whether we need publishers any more.

At the start of my career I don’t believe I ever heard the word ‘disintermediation’. Now I hear it a lot. It’s one of those polysyllabic words that makes you feel profound whenever you utter it. But how important is the process it refers to?

To answer this question we have to consider another, namely what do publishers do? Commentators are sometimes so keen to get to the ‘disintermediation’ conclusion – which does, after all, sound radical and exciting – that they rather skate over this rather pedestrian question. We need to be more rigorous than that.

For many years the industry’s standard answer to the question of what it does has been, ‘We provide content’. I’ve always thought that answer unhelpful. For one thing, it isn’t necessarily true. It all depends on what one means by ‘provide’. A little thought suggests that ‘We help to provide content’ would be a more accurate (though unfortunately less impressive) answer.

A second problem is that ‘content’ on its own usually isn’t much good to anyone – it has to be given a form of some sort. ‘Content’ only becomes content when there is a container. So really we’d have to say ‘We help to provide content and give it a form’, which isn’t a great elevator speech. So let’s stop saying that we ‘provide content’: it’s a very boring thing to say.

In fact, publishers do many things. For example, they provide capital, bear risk, and register work and archive it. But from the point of view of the industry’s future, I think two functions are essential:

(1) They co-ordinate services – for example, they co-ordinate copy-editing, typesetting, proofreading, indexing, design, printing, binding, e-book conversion, warehousing, marketing, sales, and distribution.

(2) They provide a brand. Some of those brands are recognised by consumers. For example, Mills & Boon, Haynes car manuals, and Penguin. True, most publishing brands aren’t well recognised amongst the public. (For example, how many people reading the Booker Prize winner can tell you who published it?) Brands do however mean something within the supply chain. Brands such as, say, Atlantic or Constable & Robinson do mean something to businesses such as retailers, wholesalers, and library suppliers.

What I notice most about these two functions is how different they are from each other. Providing a brand is a very different kind of thing from co-ordinating services. They involve different sets of skills. So the obvious question is, why should the same company seek to do both?

The lack of a necessary connection between the two means that the industry is ripe for unbundling – the process that the next post will examine in more detail.


8 Responses to “The future of publishing (I): disintermediation vs unbundling”

  1. In your entry about the issues of publishing, you left out one very important function, a function that is the bane of every author: deciding what NOT to publish. As an author, I hate it. As a reader who has downloaded a number of poorly written, poorly plotted novels from self-publishing sources, I appreciate it. You have probably heard the story of how the first Harry Potter book was repeatedly rejected before a publisher finally took a chance. There is, unfortunately, a reason for that hesitation to publish from a new, unknown author.

    • Thank you for your comment (and, of course, for reading). I agree the list of functions certainly isn’t complete. And the one you mention – gatekeeping, if you like – is important. I’d like to come back to it when I resume the the ‘texts about publishing’ strand of this blog, when I’ll write a review of Gill Davies’s book, Book Commissioning and Acquisition. As an author I too have had some proposals rejected. However, in my own case I don’t feel negative about these, because I trusted the judgment of the editors concerned. (The older I get, the less I want to write things that are going to be little read – so I think the editors saved me from wasting my time.)
      PS I found quite a fun little book called Rotten Rejections (Robson Books, 2002), compiled by Andre Bernard, containing extracts from rejection letters to eniment writers such as William Golding and George Orwell.

  2. […] – and giving the book a stylish cover designed by Jackie Taylor.) As I have argued in a previous post, however, publishers typically add value through co-ordinating services and branding products. At […]

  3. […] posts – for example, those on ‘disintermediation vs unbundling‘ and ‘unbundling and convergence‘ have tended to prove more popular than […]

  4. […] previous posts – on disintermediation and convergence – sought define the value-adding functions of publishers. Essentially, publishers […]

  5. […] ebooks has sharpened the question of what it is that publishers do and how they might add value. Disintermediation (here defined as the elimination of the publisher as an intermediary between author and public) has […]

  6. […] ebooks has sharpened the question of what it is that publishers do and how they might add value. Disintermediation (here defined as the elimination of the publisher as an intermediary between author and public) has […]

  7. […] vacation. For there is that other big whack the news industry is still absorbing: the so-called disintermediationof publishing. It hits photojournalism particularly hard because (a) the visual record of simply […]

Please add your response

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: