Reviews policy

Reviews of publications (broadly defined, to include digital resources) form a regular feature of Monographer’s Blog. You are welcome to propose for review resources that are aligned to the blogs aims, which are:

1. to contribute to debates on (a) publishing, (b) creative industry, and (c) micro-business;

2. to act as a resource for publisher education.

Resources for review need not be frontlist: backlist resources that are not as widely known as they deserve might also prove of interest.

Please use the comment form below to propose a resource for below, providing bibliographical information and a brief explanation of why you believe a review would be appropriate for this blog.

Please don’t send copies of resources on spec. Please note that we do not return review copies.


Please add your response

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: